Introduction to Linux
So this entire post will probably make it relatively apparent that I'm no computer wiz, but I can explain (or at least give an excuse). My dad was always very into software and he worked for Bell Labs and Lucent Technologies, so I just always let him handle my computer needs. I know nothing about Linux, but section one of the guide by Machtelt Garrels did make it sound very interesting. I can see why programmers and people who want a very customized computer experience would choose Linux. It is very versatile, and it's free. I like the part about it being free because no other operating system is! Linux gives users the option to alter their system as to their whims and I think this would make it easier to keep up with the quick pace of computer technology. My laptop is going on 5 years old now and man do I feel behind the times. But with Linux, there would be no need for that because you could just add on some new features to your liking and it'd be fresh. I have never been attracted to using Linux because it's been talked up to be such an imposing system. Although maybe I will be inclined to poke around with it in the future, since Garrels did say there are efforts underway to make the system more user friendly for beginners.
Mac OS X
The Wikipedia article and "What is Mac OS X?" both gave a great overview of this operating system. I can't say that I was that interested in it mostly because I don't care for Macs. I don't even have an iPod. I'm sure some people will *gasp* at that one. But again, I blame my dad. I asked for an mp3 player for Christmas, and despite the market being glutted with iPods, he comes back with a Creative Zen. It works fine, but I feel like the kid left of the kickball game. I know this is a source of heated debate- which is better Macs or PCs- and I don't intend to get into it. I'm just used to PCs so that's what I like, but to each his own. In the article "What is Mac OS X?" the writer stated that the article was intended for users who weren't familiar with the system, yet I felt so bogged down in all the Mac related names and terms he was using that I couldn't really get into the article. Some interesting points from the Wikipedia article that I took away were that all the releases of Mac OS X are named after large cats. I wonder why they decided to do that. Mostly the article discussed how Mac OS X was an improvement upon previous Mac operating systems and versions of itself. Not being a big Mac user, I wouldn't know the difference, but I have had friends who were super excited when Leopard came out a few years ago, so Wikipedia is probably onto something.
An Update on the Windows Roadmap
This article was a few years out of date, but it showed how much faith the company had in Vista. I've never used Vista except on a couple of my friends' computers. My laptop that I got before going to college has XP and I never upgraded. So, yes, if you're wondering, I still have XP! I never felt like I was at a loss because everyone always told me how much they disliked Vista, but I feel so behind the times now with the new release of Windows 7. Anyway, back to the article- many people complained about Vista a lot. The article stated that "Vista was a very ambitious release" and maybe this was part of its problem. However, Vista did address some of the initial issues by supporting more components over time.And Windows 7 is supposed to really have revamped things in response to user feedback.
No comments:
Post a Comment